The weird things schools do


What's going to go on this page is verbatum quotes from the newspaper.  My comments in italics.



School check list identifies student violence risk

by Michael Pearson

AP, February 15, 1999

GRANITE CITY--A student lashes out at teasing classmates.  His family life is a wreck.  Administrators learn he has access to guns at home.  (Oh joy, parents excercising their natural and constitutional right to own weapons is regarded as a warning sign.)

It could be grounds for counseling, or it could be grounds for expulsion under a new Granite City schools policy.

Believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, the policy uses a 20 point checklist to help school administrators determine whether students pose a risk of violence.

Those deemed to be "high risks" for violent acts can be referred for counseling or expelled--even if they have not violated any school policies of laws.

"In some cases we may have to make decisions that violate their rights." said superintendent Steve Balen.  (Hey, news flash.  Violating students rights will be nothing new.  Free speech--uh uh.  Warrantless searches--par for the course.)

So far, the week-old policy has not attracted any complaints--a signal to school board President John Caudron that Granite City residents want to prevent the (photogenic but statistically insignificant)  kind of fatal violence that has wracked schools in Kentucky, Oregon and Mississippi.

But district officials say they fully expect a legal challenge the first time they use the policy to remove a threatening student.

"It's a new policy and I know there are going to be bugs.  There are always bugs," Caudron said.  "But I honestly thing this is a step in the right direction."

The school board approved the policy Feb. 9.  It calls for a team composed of a police officer, a social worker, a psychologist and a school administrator to review students whose behavious has provoked concern among employees or other students.

After an initial review of a student's grades, behaviour reports, medical records and other information, the team can seek permission to interview the student and perform psychological tests.

In that phase, the team will be asked to determine the potential for violence, access to weapons and facts about the student's home life.

To help the team, the policy provides a "profile" based on a list of early warning signs developed for the U.S. Department of Education.

The list includes such characteristics as depression, a history of tantrums, abusive language, cruelty to animals and writings that reflect an interest in "the dark side of life."



From the  New Jersey Libertarian Party home page

                                        NJ Schools Forcing Students to Submit to
                                                   Drug Testing

                                        A high school student from Ewing New Jersey was
                                        recently suspended for refusing to submit to a drug test
                                        for his school.

                                        The student, Michael Glappa, had done nothing more
                                        than put his head down on his desk. Although everyone
                                        one of us has done this many times through our
                                        schooling, Michael´s teacher chose to interpret this as a
                                        sign of drug abuse.

                                        Michael was sent to the school nurse, who interrogated
                                        him about drug use. She asked him to take a drug test, and
                                        when he refused, called the vice-principal to support her
                                        demand. At no point was permission for the test
                                        requested from Michael´s parents.

                                        Michael perceived this as an unfair invasion of his privacy
                                        and insult to his dignity, and continued to refuse.

                                        Michael´s father was then contacted. When Michael Sr.
                                        arrived, he backed his son´s stand. The school responded
                                        by suspending the student from classes.

                                        To prove the point, Michael and his father had a drug test
                                        -- both blood and uring -- performed on their own the
                                        following day. The test proved that Michael was clean.
 

The student's version of the story.



AP March 11, 1999
 


Overreaction to School Gun Plot Eyed


 


                           By JENNIFER BATOG Associated Press Writer

                           BURLINGTON, Wis. (AP) -- Back in November, authorities boasted that they had
                           averted a bloodbath by arresting a group of boys who planned to steal guns from one
                           of their fathers, take high school administrators hostage and shoot students who had
                           picked on them.

                           This agricultural town of 9,500 people, best known for its chocolate factory and an
                           annual competition for the world's best liar, seemed to have narrowly escaped the
                           tragic fate of communities like West Paducah, Ky., Jonesboro, Ark., and Springfield,
                           Ore.

                           But four months later, the case is limping to a close, with police missteps forcing
                           prosecutors into plea bargains. And authorities are having to defend themselves
                           against accusations they overreacted to the whole thing.

                           At first, prosecutors wanted to charge the boys as adults, meaning they could have
                           gone to prison for 120 years.

                           But two boys who said they backed out of the plot were never charged. And the
                           remaining three, once charged with conspiracy to commit murder, ended up pleading
                           no contest to juvenile charges of reckless endangering. Those boys, all 16, can be
                           held in juvenile detention for only two years, until they turn 18.

                           Mark Nielsen, the lawyer for the alleged ringleader, said he was baffled as to how
                           tough talk from a group of teen-agers who never even touched a gun became ``the
                           biggest case in America.''

                           ``I don't think there's the slightest question about people overreacting to this case,'' he
                           said.

                           Authorities say they did the right thing, considering the school tragedies in other
                           towns. They learned of the alleged plot from an informant.

                           ``The choice comes down to doing something and seeing what evidence there was or
                           doing nothing and waiting to see what happens,'' said Ron Patla, police chief in this
                           town about 60 miles southwest of Milwaukee. ``I don't think our response was any
                           kind of an overreaction at all.''

                           Added Burlington High School Principal Jose Martinez, one of the targets of the
                           alleged plot: ``I'm grateful that the police did what they did. People want to say that
                           we overreacted, but what was the alternative? I think the students were serious.''

                           The three boys arrested had been charged with nine counts altogether, including three
                           of conspiracy to commit murder. But prosecutors eventually dropped all but one
                           count of murder conspiracy against each, saying that charge would cover all of the
                           offenses alleged.

                           Acting on the recommendation of psychologists, prosecutors also withdrew their
                           request to try the boys as adults. Still, the boys could have gotten three years in
                           juvenile detention if convicted of murder conspiracy.

                           Then last week, the case, which was based largely on the boys' statements to police,
                           all but collapsed. A judge threw out the alleged ringleader's confession because of
                           evidence police did not properly read him his rights and because they used
                           inappropriate tactics to get the statement. The judge said the interrogators' jocular
                           manner did not convey to the boy how serious the accusations were.

                           Police are reviewing the circumstances under which the boys were read their rights.
                           The police chief would not comment on the interrogation.

                           Paul Houston, executive director of the American Association of School
                           Administrators, said administrators in Burlington aren't the only ones more sensitive to
                           threats since the series of school shootings.

                           ``School people got the message that if people are threatening mass violence, you
                           better take it seriously instead of waiting and hoping it's just a prank or a teen-age
                           hoax,'' Houston said.

                           Bill Bond, principal at Heath High School in West Paducah, Ky., said he wishes
                           someone in his school had relayed a similar warning. In 1997, a 14-year-old student
                           opened fire on a group of schoolmates praying in the hall, killing three.

                           ``It would have been handled before the perpetrator entered the building,'' Bond said.
                           ``You would have never heard of us. We wouldn't have three kids dead.''



1999/5/1  The backlash against geek and oddballs after Littleton (blame anything but the system).  The whole story is far too long to quote here.  Here's the link.  If it fails I have a copy I can put up.

http://slashdot.org/articles/99/04/25/1438249.shtml

In the days after the Littleton, Colorado massacre, the country went on a panicked hunt the oddballs in High School, a profoundly ignorant and unthinking response to a tragedy that left geeks, nerds,non-conformists and the alienated in an even worse situation than before. Stories all over the country embarked on witchunts that amounted to little more than Geek Profiling. All weekend, after Friday's column here, these voiceless kids -- invisible in media and on TV talk shows and powerless in their own schools  -- have been e-mailing me with stories of what has happened to them in the past few days. Here are some of          those stories in their own words, with gratitude and admiration for their courage in sending them. The big story out  of Littleton isn't about violence on the Internet, or whether or not video games are turning out kids into killers. It's about the fact that for some of the best, brightest and most interesting kids, high school is a nightmare of exclusion, cruelty, warped values and anger.



Cleveland Live
http://www.cleveland.com/news/pdnews/metro/c13cook.ssf
 

               HUDSON - Karl Bauman has a purple belt in tae kwon do and
               likes to watch movies like "Mulan," where the heroes defend
               themselves with martial arts. So, when his teacher asked his
               third-grade class to write a positive or fun fortune, like
               one you would find in a cookie, he wrote: "You will die with
               honor."

               The result was a two-day suspension for the 9-year-old when
               school officials determined he wrote a note that was
               "threatening in nature."

               Karl's parents, Jean and Mike Bauman, are angry and they are
               appealing the suspension.

               Jean Bauman said she knows students have been suspended
               across Northeast Ohio for cases involving bomb threats, hit
               lists, verbal threats and weapons in the wake of the
               shootings at a Littleton, Colo., high school.

               But Bauman said she and her husband can't understand how her
               son's fortune-telling attempt falls in that category.

               "He meant something positive - to be a hero and die with
               honor," she said yesterday.

               Bauman said that during the April 30 class at McDowell
               Elementary School, third-graders gathered in a circle and
               each one chose a fortune from the pile to read. A girl got
               upset when she began to read Karl's fortune and got no
               further than "You will die."

               Their teacher, Amanda Caine, è000 . 0002.06érecognized the
               handwriting and asked Karl before recess if he had written
               it. "She took him and the note to the principal," Bauman
               said.

               Karl is shy and sometimes has a difficult time expressing
               himself, she said. So, when Principal Rebecca Spehler asked
               him if he thought kids would be upset by his fortune, all he
               said was girls might be because that one girl had gotten
               upset.

               When Bauman was called to the school, she was told Karl was
               being suspended for two days. He missed school on May 3 and
               4.

               An appeal hearing was held on May 6 by Daniel Seiberling,
               director of pupil services and principal of Hudson
               Elementary School. "Karl was in on a portion of it," his
               mother said. "They asked him some questions, but he was so
               rattled he said he didn't remember what happened."

               The Baumans received a note from Seiberling on Tuesday,
               saying that the district "affirmed the suspension and Karl
               had written a note that was threatening in nature," she
               said.

               Bauman said they will appeal to the school board.

               She said school officials reiterated during the appeal
               hearing that the increased attention to threats is not
               related to the Littleton deaths.

               In an April 30 press release issued by the district
               following the suspension of a high school student who had
               made verbal threats, the district wrote: "Any student who
               threatens, implies threats, creates disruption or panic will
               be disciplined and/or prosecuted to the full extent of our
               Board of Education's policies, and t